Evaluation phase
ADDIE model evaluation happens in many ways throughout the course of this model, and not just in the final stage. As we’ve already discussed, formative evaluation happens in every step. This is where you ask questions related to the content you’re developing with the goal of ensuring that it is meeting your objectives and building successfully on previous steps.
Summative ADDIE evaluation is more formal, and it can really help you see where your process needs more work. Since many training programs are developed and redeveloped over the years for continuous use, this is an important step.
Much of the information you’ll use in the ADDIE model evaluation phase comes from the assessments that instructors delivered to students at the end of their course of training. If you followed the ADDIE model precisely, then you outlined specific instructional and learning objectives in the beginning stages of development. You should now be able to see how well learners met the objectives after receiving the instruction contained in the course materials.
For instance, if one of your instructional objectives was to teach the use of a specific program, you can now use specific assessments to see whether that was effectively taught. Can students boot up the program? Can they navigate to the proper menus? Can they perform certain tasks, save the file, etc.? If so, and your objectives were met, then your training materials in this instance were successful. If learners were unable to meet the objectives, you have a wealth of information to use in determining why that was, including instructors, your own notes and the assessments themselves.
If your objectives were not clear enough from the beginning, you may find you’re having a hard time finding where improvement is needed at the end. In this case, return to the analysis phase and try to be more precise.
Instructional systems design
As you can probably see from the layout of the ADDIE model, the pivotal idea behind instructional design is making the process more accessible by providing exact steps to follow in creating training materials. Also called instructional systems design because of the fact that it follows regimented systems, the instructional design process seeks to make learners’ attainment of new skills and knowledge easier by streamlining the design process and keeping their learning at the forefront.
Many training programs simply collate a whole lot of materials without respect to the learners’ starting points, backgrounds, instructional needs, the learning setting, the barriers to learning both individually and as a group, the instructors to be used, and the organization requiring the training. Although these doubtless transmit some information, they are unlikely to be as effective as instructional design training materials are.
The fundamental disorganization and lack of respect for student needs inherent in such an approach often inhibit learning.
The instructional design process, starting with the ADDIE model as the gold standard of the ISD process, remedies this by using student needs and starting points as the cornerstone on which the rest of the training program is built. A good instructional design uses the individual facets of each organization to define its unique training program, which is why it is so effective.
The other main benefit of using an instructional design process is the simplification it offers to an otherwise overwhelming task: transmitting a large amount of information to a diverse group of people in a short amount of time. Breaking down each step allows for deep thought, excellent design, intentional instruction and a peerless learning process in the end.